This looks like great fun: iCoaster.
Yet another toy I could get for me and pretend that I really got it for BallFiend... just like the Marble Run I got him for his third birthday present. >:)
--
Showing posts with label On the Web. Show all posts
Showing posts with label On the Web. Show all posts
Tuesday, August 18, 2009
Tuesday, July 07, 2009
CAPS LOCK TRAINER KEY
DOES SOMEONE YOU KNOW HAVE A SHOUTING PROBLEM?
Fix that CAPS LOCK key forever!
--
Fix that CAPS LOCK key forever!
--
Friday, December 31, 2004
Sunday, October 17, 2004
Aussie Swearers
Oh My!
A thesis on Aussie swearing....
HOW TO DO THINGS WITH FOUR-LETTER WORDS: A study of the semantics of swearing in Australia
A thesis on Aussie swearing....
HOW TO DO THINGS WITH FOUR-LETTER WORDS: A study of the semantics of swearing in Australia
Monday, December 22, 2003
Weird Web
Weird and funny places on the net - lotsa links to lotsa odd things...
- False Advertising Gallery - http://parody.organique.com
- Adbusters - adbusters.org
- Lord Of The Rings, in Lego!
Adbusters
Adbusters Culture Jammers Headquarters has lots of cool campaigns against corporatisation of the world... get involved.
Sunday, December 07, 2003
Saturday, November 29, 2003
Unfamous Quotations
My favorite Unfamous Quotations from Gary Turner's Unfamous Quotations page:
- "I don't believe in anything but I wonder about everything." - David Mitchell
- "Would one or all of the Gods protect me from those who are certain?" - Derek Smith
- "I'm very tolerant when it doesn't affect me." - Derek Smith
- "Computer games don't affect kids. I mean, if Pacman affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to repetitive electronic music..." - Wouter Jagers
- "It's amazing what you can do if you don't care who gets the credit." - Anon
- "The one thing experience has taught me is that I never learn from it." - Derek Smith
Lullabye Language
The Big Picture - Lullaby language. A nice article describing that simple idea that one should say what one means! when writing. Clarity of language. No ambiguity. In summary (some of these are my interpretations):
- Should = Probably Won't. ("We should sign a contract." VS "We probably won't sign a contract.")
- Just = go to a lot of trouble to ("You just have to write the report." VS "You need to go to a lot of trouble to write the report.")
- All = see "just"
- Soon = Never ("I will do it... soon." VS ''I will do it... never [so go away and stop hassling!]")
- Only = significance from own perspective ("It's only a minor change." VS "I made the minor change because it didn't seem to make any significant difference to anyone else.")
- Anything = significance from own perspective ("I didn't change anything." VS "I didn't change anything that I thought would matter to anyone else.")
Friday, November 28, 2003
Seditious Internet
I came across the cluetrain manifesto today. Very interesting reading and I have only read some of Chapter 1 so far.
"...companies don't like us humans. They leverage our longing for their own ends." Fits with the thinking and learning I have been doing a lot of this year. We always seem to think of companies as an independant living entity. But any organisation only exists because it is made up of people. Yet there is a contradiction there, because organisations do develop a life of their own. Inertia keeps the place going - either up and up or further into a rut. Read Agryris on double loop learning and organisational learning. Double loop learning lets the valuable learned knowledge of individuals transfer into "the organisation", modifying norm, strategies, culture. So my question is: is it "the company" that decides I need the latest gizmo, who actually decided? Was it really "the company" (the entity), was it a strange growth from a collective consciousness, or is there one maniac individual inventing crap that no one wants or needs (until its in-your-face helps you to realise that of course you need it and how could you have ever lived without it!) and this one maniac individual has enough power over others in the organisation to make them go along?
"The Internet is inherently seditious."
We can only hope.
"...companies don't like us humans. They leverage our longing for their own ends." Fits with the thinking and learning I have been doing a lot of this year. We always seem to think of companies as an independant living entity. But any organisation only exists because it is made up of people. Yet there is a contradiction there, because organisations do develop a life of their own. Inertia keeps the place going - either up and up or further into a rut. Read Agryris on double loop learning and organisational learning. Double loop learning lets the valuable learned knowledge of individuals transfer into "the organisation", modifying norm, strategies, culture. So my question is: is it "the company" that decides I need the latest gizmo, who actually decided? Was it really "the company" (the entity), was it a strange growth from a collective consciousness, or is there one maniac individual inventing crap that no one wants or needs (until its in-your-face helps you to realise that of course you need it and how could you have ever lived without it!) and this one maniac individual has enough power over others in the organisation to make them go along?
"The Internet is inherently seditious."
We can only hope.
Tuesday, November 25, 2003
Friday, November 14, 2003
Urban Dictionary
UrbanDictionary.com. Well, it's not Everything2, but it might have potential. Unfortunately, this site currently seems to be populated with definintions of so-called Urban Slang that is:
- US-centric,
- of poor quality (many entries contain blantant spelling errors and there appears to be a distinct lack of editing: many repetitious entries for the same word - despite the fact that the site states that "Definitions may be edited"), and
- homophobic and sexist (probably racist too, but I didn't stick around to find examples of this).
Thursday, November 13, 2003
Straight to Hell
I just took Dante's Inferno Test (from www.4degreez.com). Apparently I am destined to go to the the Sixth Level of Hell - The City of Dis!
Take the Dante's Inferno Test (NB. this site times out quite often, so I hope that impatience is not one of your more sinful aspects.)
"The wretched King Minos has decided your fate. His tail wraps around his body 6 times. The sweet light no longer strikes against your eyes. Your shade has been banished to... the Sixth Level of Hell - The City of Dis!Apparently level 6 is pretty bad!:
You approach Satan's wretched city where you behold a wide plain surrounded by iron walls. Before you are fields full of distress and torment terrible. Burning tombs are littered about the landscape. Inside these flaming sepulchers suffer the heretics, failing to believe in God and the afterlife, who make themselves audible by doleful sighs. You will join the wicked that lie here, and will be offered no respite. The three infernal Furies stained with blood, with limbs of women and hair of serpents, dwell in this circle of Hell."
| Level | Score |
|---|---|
| Purgatory (Repenting Believers) | Very Low |
| Level 1 - Limbo (Virtuous Non-Believers) | Very Low |
| Level 2 (Lustful) | High |
| Level 3 (Gluttonous) | Very High |
| Level 4 (Prodigal and Avaricious) | High |
| Level 5 (Wrathful and Gloomy) | High |
| Level 6 - The City of Dis (Heretics) | Very High |
| Level 7 (Violent) | Very High |
| Level 8- the Malebolge (Fraudulent, Malicious, Panderers) | Very High |
| Level 9 - Cocytus (Treacherous) | High |
Take the Dante's Inferno Test (NB. this site times out quite often, so I hope that impatience is not one of your more sinful aspects.)
Monday, September 08, 2003
Conan Doyle
A reminder to myself... am interested in reading literary criticisms of Conan Doyle's Sherlock Holmes stories.
Some sites to follow up on:
Some sites to follow up on:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)